When I write these blogs, I try and make sure, I do not sound
preachy or super instructive because all I am trying to be is proactive –
protect you from same grave mistakes, save your time / energy and keep your
motivation to pursue this intact. I also kind of keep my tone neutral when I
comment on certain project briefs, that I get to see on various freelancing
portals.
We share these on a case to case basis as we have a growing
virtual team of BECKON Aspirants in different modes. They are most likely to
find this helpful and proactively work out a way to manage such queries from
prospective clients.
In the BECKON Learning Community, the beginners can be in
any of the following modes:
1. Reading mode – These members
self-learn by reading different sources including a beginner’s guide for online
working.
2. Learning mode – These team
members are working on their skills with one on one support from BECKON Coach
to refine their offerings and deal with clients with more confidence
3. Delivering mode – These are
associated with local or global assignments however the project lead who is
training them on this live job is front ending the client. This is entirely a
collaborative effort.
Each of these members, in different modes cannot initially gauge
what they are getting into when they respond to project like the one indicated
below:
Project Brief
I'm looking for someone to finish
this proposal
Here is what you need to consider before you respond:
1. Reading Time
If you want to figure out what is wrong with client's
current proposal, you have to read it end to end for a quick gap analysis. A
proposal can be anywhere between 8 to 10 pages. Do you want to offer this at no
cost – Your first impressions of the draft – Good, Bad or Unacceptable!
2. Research Time
The amount of research time required to deliver as per client's
expectations
3. Rationale Time
You will never be able
to figure the exact rationale first draft writer had when the content story
board was created.
For all you know, the first draft writer delivered was as per
instructions he received from client. You cannot expect the client to ever
admit his own mistake to you – if at all there has been a communication gap
from his end.
If he does admit, you can treat this as a fresh assignment and
get started. You can completely ignore the earlier outline to begin with a
fresh perspective that is relevant now. The client should be able to call out
now – what exactly he wants or trust your expertise
Based on your conclusions, you may want to probe client for
further inputs before even considering the project.
1] If the client is not happy with the existing draft and needs
a better version, can he articulate what changes he needs?
What he finds missing in the first draft? If he is not crystal clear about his
needs and edits he wants, you can be sure he is relying on you to do something
with the document.
2] The client may have his own learning requirement. While
discussing the order, you can assess if he knows his mind or is in two minds
about the draft. If he is not clear, you educate him based on your expertise.
Whether you want to do this business coaching for free as part of relationship
building or as a paid order so that he gets a sample of your thinking horizon –
it is absolutely your call.
The point here is – you have to know why the first draft did not
satisfy the client.
Stay away from freeloaders
Some portals empower buyers to claim
refund if they are not satisfied with delivered content. If the client is not
able to clarify what the draft proposal lacks, he is probably just running the
same document through another pair of expert eyes - for free.
I am not sure how neutral was that? I am sure you got the
message by now –
1] Stay miles away from any kind of messy document created by
someone else.
2] If you really have to clean any mess, it better be your
own because, that will at least be part of your learning experience - a revised
version of your own work, is any day a subtle skill enhancement.
Connect with us here if you are unsure about
any assignment - if you should proceed and execute or just drop it due to lack
of adequate direction for the right output